Technology Vendor Comparison

Chart vs Linde StarLNG vs Galileo Cryobox

A head-to-head read on deployment speed (months to first cargo / months to commission) and scale flexibility (modular train vs skid vs container stack) for the three liquefaction technologies in scope for the Catoosa export lane.

Chart FINEX vs Linde StarLNG
vs Galileo Cryobox

A head-to-head read on the three liquefaction technologies in scope for the Catoosa export lane, scored on deployment speed (months to first cargo / months to commission) and scale flexibility (modular train vs skid vs container stack). Figures are sourced from the in-repo competitor research set: Chart #1734906, Galileo #1820283 / #1835394 / #1851139, Titan #1771023 / #1786981 / #1804274, NFE, and the Stabilis brief — plus the Linde StarLNG 100–1,650 tpd/train baseline already cited in the Why Not Gulf Coast section.

Attribute
Chart (FINEX / mid-scale)
Linde StarLNG (mini-LNG)
Galileo Cryobox (micro-liquefaction)
Liquefaction tier / scale
Mid-scale liquefaction (Chart FINEX family)
Mini-LNG, 100–1,650 tpd per train
Micro-liquefaction, container-stacked trains
Modularity / form factor
Skid-mounted mid-scale modules
Standardized modular train (EPC-replicated)
ISO-container stack, plug-and-play
Capacity per train
See Chart #1734906
100–1,650 tpd per train
See Galileo #1820283 / #1835394
Lead time / months to first cargo
See Chart #1734906
See Linde StarLNG reference — views/partials/competitive.ejs
See Galileo #1851139
Months to commission / deploy
See Chart #1734906
See Linde StarLNG reference — views/partials/competitive.ejs
See Galileo #1820283 / #1835394
Scale flexibility (modular vs skid vs container)
High — skid modules repeat per spec
High — modular train repeats at standard block sizes
Highest — container stack scales linearly with unit count
Geographic suitability for inland / non-Gulf export
Equipment-only OEM; geography is buyer-led
EPC-replicated; portable to inland sites with skilled labor
Container-stacked; strongest fit for non-pipeline, island, or near-barge export

Chart FINEX / Mid-Scale

Chart is an equipment OEM — no plant of its own, sized to buyer spec. Its FINEX / mid-scale liquefaction is skid-mounted and high-repeat, which makes it the right answer for projects that already own a feed-gas anchor and want a known liquefaction block bolted on. For a producer-to-buyer export lane, Chart removes liquefaction risk but does not solve the inland-feed-gas / port-loading problem.

Linde StarLNG (Mini-LNG)

Linde Engineering operates the Port of Catoosa fabrication facility (128,000 sq ft) and offers a standardized StarLNG mini-LNG concept at 100–1,650 tpd per train. The StarLNG block is EPC-replicated — the same engineered module ships to multiple sites — which compresses months-to-commission versus bespoke mid-scale. StarLNG is the local fabrication anchor for the Catoosa scope.

Galileo Cryobox (Micro-Liquefaction)

Galileo's Cryobox is micro-liquefaction packaged as an ISO-container stack: plug-and-play modules that scale linearly with unit count. Form factor is its edge — the smallest scale flexibility in the set, beach-deployable near barge loading, and the fastest path to first cargo when feed-gas volume is right-sized per island demand. See Galileo #1820283 / #1835394 / #1851139.

The Catoosa Wedge: Full Export Stack at Our Scale & Geography

Catoosa stacks pipeline interconnect (ONEOK / Kinder Morgan / Tallgrass) + Linde StarLNG-class modular liquefaction + barge loading from the Port of Catoosa + Marine warranty survey + Caribbean and Central American delivery contracts into a single vertically integrated offer. Chart and Galileo supply one block of that stack; Linde is the local fabrication anchor. The wedge is the integration — not any one liquefaction technology alone. See Galileo #1851139 and Titan #1786981 for the contrast cases.

Sources: Chart #1734906 — Galileo #1820283 / #1835394 / #1851139 — Titan #1771023 / #1786981 / #1804274 — NFE — Stabilis brief — Linde StarLNG reference (views/partials/competitive.ejs)